Patent Foramen Ovale Management for Secondary Stroke Prevention:State-of-the-Art Appraisal of Current Evidence
Stroke 55:236-247, Sposato,L.A.,et al, 2024
Cryptogenic Stroke
NEJM 374:2065-2074, Saver, J.L., 2016
Diagnostic Yield of Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Venography in Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale
Stroke 45:2324-2329, Liberman, A.L.,et al, 2014
Clinicopathologic Conference, Acute Ischemic Stroke due to Basilar Artery Embolism. Patent Foramen Ovale
NEJM 367:1450-1460, Case 31-2012, 2012
Neurological Complications of Sclerotherapy for Varicose Veins
J Vasc Surg 55:243-251, Sarvananthan, T.,et al, 2012
Management of Stroke in Infants and Children: A Scientific Statement From a Special Writing Group of the American Heart Association Stroke Council and the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young
Stroke 39:2644-2691, Roach,E.S.,et al., 2008
Association of Atrial Septal Aneurysm and Shunt Size with Stroke Recurrence and Benefit From Patent Foramen Ovale Closure
JAMA Neurol 79:1175-1179, Mas,J-L.,et al, 2022
Five-Year Outcomes of PFO Closure or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke
NEJM 384:970-971, , 2021
Practice Advisory Update Summary: Patent Foramen Ovale and Secondary Stroke Prevention
Neurol 94:876-885, Messe, S.R.,et al, 2020
May-Thurner Syndrome as a Cause of Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source in a Young Patient
Neurol 92:e2507-e2509, De Leon-Benedetti, A.,et al, 2019
Evidence-Based Management of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients with Ischemic Stroke
JAMA Neurol 75:147-148, Kamel, H., 2018
Patent Foramen Ovale Closure, Antiplatelet Therapy or Anticoagulation Therapy Alone for Management of Cryptogenic Stroke?
BMJ 362:k2515, Kuijpers, T.,et al, 2018
Long-Term Outcomes of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Medical Therapy after Stroke
NEJM 377:1022-1032,1006,1093, Saver, J.L.,et al, 2017
Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Anticoagulation Vs. Antiplatelets after Stroke
NEJM 377:1011-1021,1006,1093, Mas, J.L,et al, 2017
Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke
NEJM 377:1033-1042,1006,1093, Sondergaard, L.,et al, 2017
Embolic Strokes of Unknown Source and Cryptogenic Stroke: Implications in Clinical Practice
Front Neurol 7:1-16, Nouh, A.,et al, 2016
Clinicopathologic Conference, Acute Ischemic Stroke, Caused by Paradoxical Embolism Through a Patent Foramen Ovale, in a Patient with the May-Thurner Syndrome and a Hypercoagulable State Due to an Occult Renal-Cell Carcinoma
NEJM 374:1671-1680, Case 13-2016, 2016
Closure Versus Medical Therapy for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale and a History of Cryptogenic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack
Stroke 47:e188-e189, Li, J.,et al, 2016
The Value of Transesophageal Echocardiography for Embolic Strokes of Undetermined Source
Neuol 87:988-995, Katsanos, A.H.,et al, 2016
Acute Ischemic Stroke in Pediatric Patients
Stroke 46:e32-e33, Mittal, S.O.,et al, 2015
Cryptic Loss of Consciousness in a 36-Year-Old Woman
Stroke 46:e164-e166, Martinez Majander, N.,et al, 2015
An Index to Identify Stroke-Related vs Incidental Patent Foramen Ovale in Cryptogenic Stroke
Neurol 81:619-625,619, Kent, D.M.,et al, 2013
Patent Foramen Ovale Closure and Medical Treatments for Secondary Stroke Prevention
Stroke 43:422-431, Kitsios,G.D.,et al, 2012
Closure or Medical Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke with Patent Foramen Ovale
NEJM 366:991-999,1048, Furlan,A.J.,et al, 2012
Guidelines for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association
Stroke 42:227-276, Furie,K.L.,et al, 2011
Study Design of the CLOSURE I Trial: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the STARFlex Septal Closure System Versus Best Medical Therapy in Patients With Stroke or TIA Due to Presumed Paradoxical Embolism Through a PFO
Stroke 41:2872-2883, Furlan,A.J.,et al, 2010
Recurrent Cerebral Ischemia in Medically Treated Patent Foramen Ovale: A Meta-Analysis
Neurol 73:89-97,84, Almekhlafi,M.A.,et al, 2009
May-Thurner Syndrome in Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale
Stroke 40:1502-1504, Kiernan, T.J.,et al, 2009
Guidelines for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack
Stroke 37:577-617, Sacco,R.L.,et al, 2006
Therapeutic Strategies After Examination by Transesophageal Echocardiography in 503 Patients with Ischemic Stroke
Stroke 37:859-864, Harloff,A.,et al, 2006
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Stroke Attributable to Patent Foramen Ovale: Significance of Concomitant Atrial Septum Aneurysm
Stroke 37:2030-2034, Bonati,L.H.,et al, 2006
Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale After Cryptogenic Stroke
Lancet 368:350-352, Wrle,J., 2006
PFO Management:Neurologists vs Cardiologists
Neurol 65:172-173, Messe,S.R.,et al, 2005
Patent Foramen Ovale in Young Adults with Unexplained Stroke
NEJM 353:2361-2372, Kizer,J.R. &Devereux,R.B., 2005
Patent Foramen Ovale and Recurrent Stroke: Closure is the Best Option: No
Stroke 35:804-805,806, Tong,D.C. &Becker,K.J., 2004
Patent Foramen Ovale and Recurrent Stroke: Closure is the Best Option: Yes
Stroke 35:803-804,806, Furlan,A.J., 2004
Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale Reduces the Frequency of Migraine attacks
Neurol 62:1399-1401, Schwerzmann,M.,et al, 2004
Practice Parameter: Recurrent Stroke with Patent Foramen Ovale and Atrial Septal Aneurysm
Neurol 62:1042-1050, Messe,S.R.,et al, 2004
Age As a Determinant of Adverse Events in Medically Treated Cryptogenic Stroke Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale
Stroke 35:2145, Homma,S.,et al, 2004
Incidence and Clinical Course of Thrombus Formation on Atrial Septal Defect and Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Devices in 1,000 Consecutive Patients
J Am Coll Cardiol 43:302-309, Krumsdorf,U.,et al, 2004
Incidence of Thrombus Formation on the CardioSEAL and the Amplatzer Interatrial Closure Devices
Am J Cardiol 93:426-431, Anzai,H.,et al, 2004
Clinicopath Conf., Brain Abscess Due to Infection with Streptococcus milleri and Haemophilus aphrophilus
NEJM 348:2125-2132, Case 16:2003, 2003
Recurrent Thromboembolic Events After Percutaneous Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale
ICVTS 2:125-127, Brgermann,J.,et al, 2003
Risks of Tumor Embolization in the Presence of an Unrecognized Patent Foramen Ovale: Case Report
AJNR 23:982-984, Horowitz,M.B.,et al, 2002
Fat embolism syndrome and elective knee arthroplasty
Can J Anesth 49:19-23, Jenkins, K.,et al, 2002
Prognosis After Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale for Paradoxical Embolism
Neurol 57:1330-1332, Wahl,A.,et al, 2001
Recurrent Cerebrovascular Events Associated With Patent Foramen Ovale, Atrial Septal Aneurysm, or Both
NEJM 345:1740-1746, Mas,J.,et al, 2001
The Association Between the Diameter of a Patent Foramen Ovale and the Risk of Embolic Cerebrovascular Events
Am J Med 109:456-462,506, Schuchlenz,H.W.,et al, 2000
Detection of Patent Foramen Ovale. Transesophageal Echocardiography and Transcranial Doppler Sonography With Ultrasound Contrast Media are "Supplementary, Not Competing, Diagnostic Methods"
Med Klin 94:367-370, Heckmann,J.G.,et al, 1999